Problem
Legal intake is high-friction for callers and high-risk for firms when urgency, jurisdiction, conflict checks, and advice boundaries are handled inconsistently.
R&D case study
Legal intake workflow that screens urgency, gathers structured information, and routes cases without inconsistent or unsafe responses.
At a glance
Delivery stage
R&D
Current state
Prototype
My role
Sole architect and backend engineer
Legal intake is high-friction for callers and high-risk for firms when urgency, jurisdiction, conflict checks, and advice boundaries are handled inconsistently.
Built as a guarded intake architecture. A deterministic policy engine enforces jurisdiction, emergency, conflict, and legal-advice constraints before an AI layer can respond. Validated outputs are persisted with transcripts and routed to intake specialists through notification workflows.
Working prototype with policy-gated intake flow, jurisdiction detection, and conflict-check pipeline
This section shows the operational logic behind the build, not just the user-facing surface.
Core constraint
Validation and safety boundary: every LLM response must pass through a deterministic policy engine before reaching callers
The system work is visible in the intake flow design, safety boundaries, and validation-first response architecture.
More work at a similar delivery stage.

Lead automation platform designed to handle calls, qualification, and CRM handoff without manual follow-up bottlenecks.
My Role
Sole architect and full-stack engineer
Outcome
Architecture validated with working voice gateway, queue orchestration, and CRM integration layer; advancing toward pilot deployment

Audio-processing pipeline that turns raw recordings into transcripts, summaries, and reusable knowledge outputs.
My Role
Sole architect and pipeline engineer
Outcome
End-to-end pipeline processing audio through transcription and summarization to structured artifacts